Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
Hello boys and girls. Wanted. As above. Postage or collection if not too far.
Happy Christmas
Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
-
hairlesshunter
- Posts: 265
- Joined: 01 Jul 2013, 19:22
- Location: bradford west yorkshire
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
The 4-20x50 s tac works well as well and half the price

Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
Cheers for that. I'll look into it. Also seen the 6-25x50 but that looks a little short to put camera unit on. Anyone?
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
Whats the stac 4x20x50 like at last light plus whats the clarity like on full mag,would it work well with archer
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
I have the 3-16x42 which uses the same glass as the 4-20x50.
They are good value for money scopes, but the glass is definitely not as good as 2.5-17.5x56.
At last light and with a Ward 700 type add-on for NV work themore expensive model is noticeably better
I don't have an archer so can't comment on how the S-TAC would perform with it
Cheers
Bruce
They are good value for money scopes, but the glass is definitely not as good as 2.5-17.5x56.
At last light and with a Ward 700 type add-on for NV work themore expensive model is noticeably better
I don't have an archer so can't comment on how the S-TAC would perform with it
Cheers
Bruce
LAND ROVER - THE WORLD'S WORST 4X4 BY FAR
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
Mr. Phoenix, sir,
How did the 3-16x42 compare to your 6500, which I have in the 2.5-16x50 flavour?
How did the 3-16x42 compare to your 6500, which I have in the 2.5-16x50 flavour?
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
I have a 6500 in 2.5-16x42 and I would say that the S-TAC has the edge for NV use in that I can get a clear image from it at a higher magnification than the 6500.
For daylight use I couldn't see any difference between the two.
Cheers
Bruce
For daylight use I couldn't see any difference between the two.
Cheers
Bruce
LAND ROVER - THE WORLD'S WORST 4X4 BY FAR
Re: Wanted. Sightron S-TAC 2.5-17.5
Thank you for that.
















