Page 1 of 2

TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 13:43
by some bloke
And then there were two.








































Test blocks that is. 8-)

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 13:45
by PESCA
Top of the class, Dave :wave:

George

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 13:58
by some bloke
I sometimes surprise myself at how observant I am.

Even mam told me I was a clever boy once. :lol:

Oh yea, and I thought that might be a good way of letting you know the two blocks work OK this end. :thumbup:

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 15:51
by silent shooter
Tell you what you did miss Dave.......................most users on line jumped from 220 to 240 on the 3rd of this month :roll:

Geoff

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 21:41
by rodp
some bloke wrote:I sometimes surprise myself at how observant I am.

Even mam told me I was a clever boy once. :lol:

Oh yea, and I thought that might be a good way of letting you know the two blocks work OK this end. :thumbup:
She was lying Dave, just trying to make her little boy feel good :twisted:


:lol: :lol:

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 22:24
by some bloke
Ay, that's my mam. :D

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 23:25
by paulham
Silent Shooter wrote:Tell you what you did miss Dave.......................most users on line jumped from 220 to 240 on the 3rd of this month :roll:

Geoff
But isn't that based on 999 mins ? Which is 16.65 hours. 240 separate users over a 16 hour period.
Or have I understood this wrong?

If I'm right, It should be 15mins, then we will get an accurate number

:)

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 23:37
by PESCA
Well Paul, you're right, but you're wrong :crazy:

As it's not a fixed point in time, (ie; it's rolling) you have some drop out and some enter.

I know what you're saying about a fifteen minute window, but as we started with that amount of minutes (we don't know why, we just failed to alter it when we started) we're staying with it so that we have a direct comparison.

So, whatever the time window, we've still topped our previous best by twenty members, which was set in March this year.

The main figures are at the top of the page. We've more than doubled our hits for 2012 in it's entirety and it's only early November.

Clear as mud?

George

Re: TWO

Posted: 06 Nov 2013, 23:40
by paulham
Haha. Understood

So in a ideal world you should have started of with a lower number.
But now it would be silly to change as you wouldn't have data to compare.

The site is really kicking off. I'm surprised no one else has taken the advertising space

Re: TWO

Posted: 07 Nov 2013, 00:32
by silent shooter
The site is really kicking off. I'm surprised no one else has taken the advertising space

To quote a well known member `'watch those spaces' :silent: