Test blocks that is.
TWO
-
some bloke
- NON EMMET
- Posts: 9501
- Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:14
- Location: Leicester mostly but DEEP S.West sometimes
TWO
And then there were two.
Test blocks that is.
Test blocks that is.
-
some bloke
- NON EMMET
- Posts: 9501
- Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:14
- Location: Leicester mostly but DEEP S.West sometimes
Re: TWO
I sometimes surprise myself at how observant I am.
Even mam told me I was a clever boy once.
Oh yea, and I thought that might be a good way of letting you know the two blocks work OK this end.
Even mam told me I was a clever boy once.
Oh yea, and I thought that might be a good way of letting you know the two blocks work OK this end.
-
silent shooter
- FOUNDER
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:30
- Location: Reading, Berkshire
Re: TWO
Tell you what you did miss Dave.......................most users on line jumped from 220 to 240 on the 3rd of this month 
Geoff
Geoff
Re: TWO
She was lying Dave, just trying to make her little boy feel goodsome bloke wrote:I sometimes surprise myself at how observant I am.
Even mam told me I was a clever boy once.
Oh yea, and I thought that might be a good way of letting you know the two blocks work OK this end.
"Land Rover, the worlds best 4x4 by far"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
"Argo, a great 8x8"
-
some bloke
- NON EMMET
- Posts: 9501
- Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:14
- Location: Leicester mostly but DEEP S.West sometimes
Re: TWO
Ay, that's my mam. 
Re: TWO
But isn't that based on 999 mins ? Which is 16.65 hours. 240 separate users over a 16 hour period.Silent Shooter wrote:Tell you what you did miss Dave.......................most users on line jumped from 220 to 240 on the 3rd of this month
Geoff
Or have I understood this wrong?
If I'm right, It should be 15mins, then we will get an accurate number
Click the link for a -
-
PESCA
Re: TWO
Well Paul, you're right, but you're wrong 
As it's not a fixed point in time, (ie; it's rolling) you have some drop out and some enter.
I know what you're saying about a fifteen minute window, but as we started with that amount of minutes (we don't know why, we just failed to alter it when we started) we're staying with it so that we have a direct comparison.
So, whatever the time window, we've still topped our previous best by twenty members, which was set in March this year.
The main figures are at the top of the page. We've more than doubled our hits for 2012 in it's entirety and it's only early November.
Clear as mud?
George
As it's not a fixed point in time, (ie; it's rolling) you have some drop out and some enter.
I know what you're saying about a fifteen minute window, but as we started with that amount of minutes (we don't know why, we just failed to alter it when we started) we're staying with it so that we have a direct comparison.
So, whatever the time window, we've still topped our previous best by twenty members, which was set in March this year.
The main figures are at the top of the page. We've more than doubled our hits for 2012 in it's entirety and it's only early November.
Clear as mud?
George
Re: TWO
Haha. Understood
So in a ideal world you should have started of with a lower number.
But now it would be silly to change as you wouldn't have data to compare.
The site is really kicking off. I'm surprised no one else has taken the advertising space
So in a ideal world you should have started of with a lower number.
But now it would be silly to change as you wouldn't have data to compare.
The site is really kicking off. I'm surprised no one else has taken the advertising space
Click the link for a -
-
silent shooter
- FOUNDER
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:30
- Location: Reading, Berkshire
Re: TWO
The site is really kicking off. I'm surprised no one else has taken the advertising space
To quote a well known member `'watch those spaces'
To quote a well known member `'watch those spaces'