Why.

A place to introduce yourself, chat about anything and put forward suggestions.
Instructions on how to add your location and photographs.
Post Reply
User avatar
chas
Banned again
Posts: 1755
Joined: 15 Oct 2011, 22:10
Location: East Riding.

Why.

Post by chas » 23 Oct 2012, 22:01

Why at this point in time do we have have 54 guest viewers when as far as I can tell they can't actually read anything without joining up ????
Am I missing something here :? :? :wtf:
Effluent in many languages.

User avatar
Marky610
Posts: 3503
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 15:10
Location: Mid Suffolk
Contact:

Re: Why.

Post by Marky610 » 23 Oct 2012, 22:32

I recon it's 54 guest's who looked in the last 999mins and found that they couldn't see anything ;)



:geek:
Land Rovers, who would be daft enough to own one?

PESCA

Re: Why.

Post by PESCA » 24 Oct 2012, 07:56

Chris, we (Geoff and I) personally sanction or reject any 'would be' new members. We have, literally, hundreds of applications each day, the majority of which are spammers, which we attempt to detect and kick into touch.

So, those 'guests' that you see are a mixture of membership applications. We don't use a 'spammer' application filter of any sort, as we're afraid that those people with unusual user names or email addresses would get turned away. We've done that ourselves before now.

Hope that's a little clearer than mud :wtf:

George

User avatar
some bloke
NON EMMET
Posts: 9501
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 16:14
Location: Leicester mostly but DEEP S.West sometimes

Re: Why.

Post by some bloke » 24 Oct 2012, 15:39

I must admit I find the 999 minutes bit wierd - why is that?

User avatar
fizzbangwhallop
Posts: 2613
Joined: 18 Oct 2011, 11:27
Location: north herts

Re: Why.

Post by fizzbangwhallop » 24 Oct 2012, 19:41

some bloke wrote:I must admit I find the 999 minutes bit wierd - why is that?
Possibly because the System Programmer only had a 3 digit field to store the figure as allocated by the System Designer/Specifier 'cos they thought that w'be all they needed.


atb
Fizz (once upon a time.... long long ago)
8-)
Image

A correct grip on the butt & cheekweld is imperative for accurate shooting. :crazy: :lol:

User avatar
chas
Banned again
Posts: 1755
Joined: 15 Oct 2011, 22:10
Location: East Riding.

Re: Why.

Post by chas » 24 Oct 2012, 20:20

fizzbangwhallop wrote:
some bloke wrote:I must admit I find the 999 minutes bit wierd - why is that?
Possibly because the System Programmer only had a 3 digit field to store the figure as allocated by the System Designer/Specifier 'cos they thought that w'be all they needed.


atb
Fizz (once upon a time.... long long ago)
8-)

Just what I was thinking Fizz and when you take into account BS99051, the angular phase and bioptic integration of polyethelene, it does make sense :think: :eh:
Effluent in many languages.

silent shooter
FOUNDER
Posts: 1826
Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:30
Location: Reading, Berkshire

Re: Why.

Post by silent shooter » 24 Oct 2012, 22:31

fizzbangwhallop wrote:
some bloke wrote:I must admit I find the 999 minutes bit wierd - why is that?
Possibly because the System Programmer only had a 3 digit field to store the figure as allocated by the System Designer/Specifier 'cos they thought that w'be all they needed.


atb
Fizz (once upon a time.... long long ago)
8-)
Exactly what fizz says :silent:

Gloop
Posts: 2023
Joined: 02 Nov 2011, 13:09
Location: Andover

Re: Why.

Post by Gloop » 25 Oct 2012, 12:09

isn't there something to do with the airspeed velocity of a swallow in there?

User avatar
fizzbangwhallop
Posts: 2613
Joined: 18 Oct 2011, 11:27
Location: north herts

Re: Why.

Post by fizzbangwhallop » 25 Oct 2012, 18:22

And the price of wet fish!





Fizz
Image

A correct grip on the butt & cheekweld is imperative for accurate shooting. :crazy: :lol:

silent shooter
FOUNDER
Posts: 1826
Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:30
Location: Reading, Berkshire

Re: Why.

Post by silent shooter » 25 Oct 2012, 18:38

fizzbangwhallop wrote:And the price of wet fish!





Fizz
If pork prices get any higher pigs wiil be flying :thumbup:

Post Reply